Here in the Bay Area, the foggy days of summer have given over to the clear, crisp days of autumn. For many of us who were programmed early to think in terms of the academic year, autumn is when we begin thinking seriouslyperhaps even strategicallyabout business, career, and the upcoming new year.
Strategic thinking has become a topic of great interest in recent years. I was beginning to think, however, that it was falling into the same category as the weathersomething that everyone talks about but nobody actually does anything about. One day when a customer asked if we had anything on the subject, I answeredtruthfully but spontaneouslythat we were thinking about doing something on the topic. I will cheerfully acknowledge that there was nothing strategic about that response, but it propelled me into doing the research and development that has resulted in our new program, Strategic Thinking: Leadership Practices for Innovative Organizations. It has been a fascinating journey.
We have now presented the program successfully four times to organizations in four very different industrieshealth care, manufacturing, finance, and government. As different as the participants challenges were, the tools were universally appreciated and applicable.
We are very excited about this new program. It seems to be a subject of great interest in these days and times where uncommon wisdom is so greatly needed. Strategic thinking means thinking backward from a desired result to the actions needed to get there. Strategic thinking is a continuous process rather than an eventapplying it means that you continue moving toward your vision, modifying your tactics as circumstances change. It encompasses critical thinking, systems thinking, and creative thinking. In this issue, were including an article on Errors in Thinking from that program. I can say that Ive personally road-tested just about every one of those errors at some point in my life!
In this newsletter, were introducing a new occasional feature which we call In the Media. From time to time, I am interviewed for articles in business and trade publications that might be of interest to our readersand once in a while, we see an article that we want to share with youwe particularly liked the BusinessWeek article on Procter & Gamble!
Kim
Errors in logic and reasoning have been studied for millennia by philosophers, mathematicians, psychologists, and educators. One well-known philosopher, John Locke, (1342-1704) identified three types of thinking errors:
At this writing, the U.S. economy is dealing with the result of a good deal of erroneous thinking on the part of senior business leaders, resulting in scandals, arrests, and business failures and a temporary (one can hope) loss of faith in the soundness of American business practices.
Certain types of errors in thinking occur frequently in business decision-making. They are not different from the fallacies you studied in your college logic class, but they can be extremely costly to your business and your career. Some aspects of organizational culture can support the types of errors identified so succinctly by Locke. These cultural values and norms can be very positive, but if leaders are not careful in interpreting them, they may work against strategic and critical thinking.
This past summer, Kim Barnes spent a couple of weeks in Mexico, training our Mexican partners at Competecia Organizacional to deliver our Intelligent Risk-Taking program. Our indefatigable colleagues not only did a great job of translating risk-taking to Latin culture, but will be translating the entire program into Spanish sometime in the very near future.
Watch our next newsletter for an article on intelligent risk-taking by Competencia Organizacional consultant Marilu Aguilar.
Kim Barnes was interviewed for an article on negotiation in this past Augusts HR magazine. The article is entitled Know When to Hold Em and is available online at http://www.shrm.org/hrmagazine/articles/0802/default.asp?page=0802agn-staffing.htm#df
Make sure you are clear on the difference between negotiation and debate, says negotiation expert Kim Barnes, president and CEO of Barnes & Conti Associates Inc., an organizational development firm in Berkeley, Calif.
Barnes stresses that in negotiations based on salary, or anything else, it is important to minimize arguments on the merits of a proposal and to maximize offers of exchange to meet needs. You cant win a negotiation any more than you can win a marriage, adds Barnes. Negotiation is not about winning. Its about finding points of mutual agreement. Its like building a house that you both are going to live in.
(HR Magazaine Online, August 2002, article by David Fiedler Society for Human Resource Management)
One of Barnes & Contis recent partnerships has been with Procter & Gamble. We developed our program, Creating a Culture for Risk and Innovation to help them change their organizational culture to better support intelligent risk-taking.
Although we can hardly take credit for Procter & Gambles recent successes, it was nonetheless gratifying to read an article in this past Augusts Business Week magazine about one of Procter & Gambles most successful product launches to date, the SpinBrush. Below is a brief excerpt from the article:
SpinBrush marks a dramatic departure for the 165-year-old company. For once, P&G didnt insist on controlling every step, from product development to pricing. Instead, it harnessed its greatest strengththe ability to market and distribute productsto the innovation and risk-taking ability of a tiny startup that wasnt constrained by the culture inside P&Gs Cincinnati headquarters.
We found the article to be interesting and instructive.
Our entire roster of 2003 public programs is available for online registration at the link below. For the first time ever, we are offering Strategic Thinking and From Conflict to Consensus as public programs. We will also be offering Exercising Influence, Intelligent Risk-Taking, Constructive Negotiation, and COACH for Peak Performance. Upcoming programs are listed below.
Exercising Influence
December
3-4, 2002, Milpitas, CA
January 22-23, 2003, San Francisco, CA
Constructive Negotiation
January 29-30, 2003, Milpitas, CA
Strategic Thinking
February 19, 2003
Editors Note: You can substitue vegetable stock for chicken stock. Also, if you want to make a lower fat version, you can increase the stock by about 1 cup, increase the flour to 3 1/2 tablespoons, add 1 tablspoon of olive oil to the butter in step #7, and reduce the cream to just over 1/2 cup (or as much as you dare.
What are you an engineer or something? asked the Seven of Spades.
No, Im Alice. Who are you?
Marketing. they replied in perfect fifty-two part harmony.
And what is that? asked Alice...
The queen cleared her throat, adjusted her tie a second time and stared directly at Alice. We provide the strategic thinking necessary to grow the business.
Oh, said Alice, you figure out what products to build!
Heavens, no! exclaimed the Queen, Thats too tactical. We feel its our job to develop the vision for the long term.
You develop things, began Alice, so you build the products?
No! No! shouted the Queen. You still do not understand. We take the pulse of the key market leaders demand curve.
I see now. said Alice, You sell the products.
The queen was furious and repeated her original greeting. Off with her head! Off With her head
WAIT! demanded Alice. I believe I understand. You are all responsible for driving the solution opportunities for the key client supply perceptions through strategic vision management! Alice wondered if she should add something about the claws catching, and frumious bandersnatches and thought that shed best leave it at that before she became ill.
Yes, screamed the cards, Thats exactly right!
(author unknown)
Copyright © 2002 Barnes & Conti Associates, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Please send feedback to newsltr1
at barnesconti.com
Barnes & Conti, 940 Dwight Way Suite 15, Berkeley, CA 94710, USA
Copyright © 2004 Barnes & Conti Associates, Inc. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
Barnes & Conti is a spam-free zone. We do not sell, trade, or give email addresses to anyone.