Political campaigns always remind me of how much we are formed and shaped by our value systems. Although we think of ourselves as rational and reasonable people, responsive to data and logic, it is also clear that values inform and direct our choices and behavior, both in the workplace and outside of it. In this political season, we are acutely aware of how our personal values attract us to those whom we believe agree with and represent those values—in many cases, we do so even when our vested interests might argue for another choice. Campaign rhetoric often refers to those values and speaks directly to the “true believers” of the left or the right, polarizing the debate. Civil discourse across boundaries of values and belief systems can be very difficult. In organizations, the “true believers” may represent different technologies or different visions for the future. Here, too, civil discourse—or what we have come to refer to as “constructive debate”* is too often replaced by repetitive arguments and unproductive conflict.
I think that values belong in business discussions and decision-making. In fact, corporate values should become rigorous criteria for decision-making rather than bland slogans. In order for that to happen, however, teams and organizations must examine their stated values and acknowledge their values—in-practice (those that actually inform their decisions). By making our implicit values explicit and by examining the impact of our stated values on day-to-day decisions, we are in a position to make conscious choices about what we stand for as individuals and organizations. In this way, we develop moral and ethical maturity and authenticity.
Our values are indeed “where we come from.” This month is the 95th anniversary of the birth of my “values mentor”—my mother, Lorraine Shapiro. I have been reflecting on what I—and the many others whose life she touched through her family, her friendships, and her many years of work at Kaiser Permanente—learned from her example. This issue’s featured article is a tribute to her.
Because we are so focused on leadership at this time, we are also reprising an article on that topic. I can only hope that, regardless of the results of local and national elections in the U.S. and elsewhere, we will all find our way to more constructive debate, discussion, and resolution of differences, based on important values that we share, in our communities, organizations, and nations.
—Kim
*Constructive Debate: Building Better Ideas™ is one of our newest programs. Click here for the program description. Please read our new item about the program’s launch.
B. Kim Barnes
There is a lot of discussion in the media these days about values. Because the work we do often involves organizational values and their application to decision-making, I have followed these discussions with great interest. In too many organizations, values are either bland and non-controversial statements that are too broad to be applied clearly to any decision, or statements that are made and then not acted upon, leading to cynicism and comments about the leadership “not walking the talk.” I was influenced many decades ago by Sidney Simon of the University of Massachusetts, who talked about the difference between aspirations (what we would like to believe in and represent) and values (what we act on and apply to our decision-making every day).
I had occasion to reflect on this recently, as I was working with an organization that intends to change its culture. They are articulating and specifying their values, which have been implicit in the work they have done over many years. Next, they will look at how to “operationalize” them so they become tools for decision-making. It has been my experience that organizations, large and small, rarely need to change their values—they need to remember them and to think through what they really mean, then translate them into decisions and actions.
It is difficult to think about and work with organizational values without reflecting on personal values. When I think of my personal values, I think first of my mother, Lorraine Shapiro. She was a woman of great presence, grace, warmth, and moral authority. She was a high school track athlete in Minneapolis, a rebellious daughter, a mezzo-soprano who worked for several years to fund a year living and singing in New York that her father wouldn’t support, a wife and mother who made a rich life for her family with very limited resources. In her mid-fifties she went to work (her first paid job since her early twenties) at Kaiser Permanente in Los Angeles as a receptionist to make ends meet and became a beloved and admired employee there for twenty years. In retirement, she moved to be nearer her family and we were blessed with her presence and wisdom for ten years. A few years ago, I reflected on what I had learned from her about how to live one’s values. Those values in my family included, among others, fairness, honesty, respect, courage, humility, self-reliance, responsibility, commitment, learning, and generosity of spirit. I do try (and often fail) to live them every day in my life and my work. Her principles for making values live—mostly gleaned from what she did, not what she said—I call “Lorraine’s Laws.” Here they are:
I have had the good fortune to benefit from this wisdom, falling short and trying again, learning along the way. I hope the ongoing discussion of personal, political, and organizational values leads us all to reflect on what we share, to respect our differences, and to put our values to work to create stronger and more principled families, organizations, and communities.
B. Kim Barnes
Barnes & Conti Classic, Reprinted from May 2002
A leader is a person to whom others turn for direction, inspiration, moral authority, or support. No title, however grand, confers the qualities of leadership on anyone. Leadership is earned, person by person, through behaviors that qualify in the minds of others as leadership behaviors. In the end, a leader is someone whom we trust to guide us toward a shared future.
These four styles of leadership are derived from the work of the Tibetan sage, Milarepa, who described four ways to leadnoble, peaceful, fascinating, and stern.
Noble: The Noble leader leads by example and moral authority; he or she represents by his or her actions the highest expression of the values and principles by which the organization governs itself. The Noble leader is admirable and meritorious. He or she is seen as impressive, heroic, extraordinary; one who is virtuous, valorous, and incorrupt. Many people view Nelson Mandela and Mother Teresa as Noble leaders. The basis of their leadership is moral authority (although the people who worked most directly with Mother Teresa also characterized her as Stern).
Peaceful: The Peaceful leader leads through nurturing and supporting the people and creating an environment where they can be their best and highest selves. The Peaceful leader is serene and steadfast, characterized by a quiet dignity, a gracious and caring manner. Bishop Tutu of South Africa is nearly universally thought of in this way, as was Mahatma Ghandi. Their leadership is founded on trustboth trustworthiness and trust in others.
Fascinating: The Fascinating leader leads through stimulating the hopes, imagination, and dreams of the people and enabling them to see a vision of the future. The Fascinating leader may be either charming or charismatic. Ronald Reagan, Tony Blair, and Bill Clinton typify the charming leaderengaging and appealing (to those who elected and support them). Jack Kennedy and Martin Luther King exemplify the charismatic leaderenergetic, dynamic, and vigorous. Their leadership is based on attunement to others or a shared vision. These leaders are the great communicators, able to tap into common hopes and dreams.
Stern: The Stern leader leads through reminding the people of their duties and responsibilities and calling them to account for their actions or lack of action. The Stern leader is strict and rigorous. He or she is seen as shrewd and authoritative. Margaret Thatcher and Charles de Gaulle, among recent political leaders, best fit that profile. George W. Bush, especially after September 11, has made speeches that are good examples of stern leadership, although some of his campaign speeches exemplified a more peaceful style. Stern leaders lead based on the strength and certainty of their commitment and convictions.
In todays complex organizations, the successful leader must know how to lead in all of these styles and when each of them is most appropriate. For example, during a crisis, when time is of the essence, the Stern leadership style may help move people to focused action. When there are decisions to be made that require good judgment, the Noble style may be of greatest value. When relationships and morale are highly important, the Peaceful style is called for, and when people lack energy or alignment, the Fascinating style can transform a situation.
We made it! Barnes & Conti was selected by the East Bay Business Times as one of the “Fast 50” Fastest Growing Private Companies in the Greater East Bay. The East Bay Business Times will publish their annual Fast 50 list on July 23. The Fast 50 award is based on either percentage of revenue or percentage of growth over the past three years. Barnes & Conti was number 25 based on over 60% revenue growth. Our thanks to all our friends who helped us to achieve this milestone!
To read about the 50 fastest growing companies, click here
To read our press release, click here.
News flash: Barnes & Conti selected as one of the Bay Area's 100 fastest growing companies. Visit our website for details.
Kim Barnes and Senior Associate Rebecca Hendricks recently completed a successful pilot of our new Constructive Debate™ program. Participants—largely made up of engineers and software designers—were very enthusiastic.
“All the material was great. I can really see turning ‘arguments’ into productive output...and we can all use more of that!”... “It provides useful tools for handling challenges and exploring a diversity of viewpoints within a group.”
We were delighted with the response and look forward to introducing the new program to a number of our customers in the near future.
The Barnes & Conti website is sporting an updated look! In addition, we have greatly expanded our home page and the page that describes what we do. Other new features include:
Please visit our What’s New page; it is regularly updated and contains many late-breaking stories that don’t make it into our newsletter.
Robert B. Cialdini, Petia K.
Petrova, and Noah J. Goldstein
MIT Sloan Management Review, Spring 2004 (excerpt from abstract)
Companies deploying dishonest tactics toward customers, suppliers, distributors and others typically do so to increase short-term profits, and in that regard they might succeed. But the misconduct is likely to fuel social psychological processes within the organization that have the potential for ruinous fiscal outcomes, outweighing short-term gains. There are three types of consequences to organizational dishonesty: reputation degradation, (mis)matches between values of employees and the organization, and increased surveillance. These outcomes can lead to decreases in repeat business and job satisfaction — and increases in worker turnover, employee theft and other hidden costs...
Article available (for purchase) on the web
By Louis Lavelle and Amy Borrus
BusinessWeek Online, January 26 2004
(excerpt)
Amid the hand-wringing over corporate scandals, the Business Roundtable has unveiled an initiative to train the nation's CEOs in the finer points of ethics. But experts wonder if these old dogs can be taught new tricks.
The Roundtable’s plan is certainly ambitious: The association of top CEOs will start an ethics institute at the Darden Graduate School of Business Administration at the University of Virginia to conduct research, develop a B-school ethics program, and lead seminars. “As the chief ethics officers at our companies, we know setting and maintaining the highest ethical standards starts at the top,” says Henry A. McKinnell, the group's chairman and Pfizer Inc.’s ( PFE ) CEO. “This effort will support business leaders to maintain a cutting-edge culture of ethical business practices.”
Click here for the entire article.
November 16-17 in Lake Buena Vista (Orlando), Florida
Kim Barnes, Lisa Cavallero (Cisco Systems), and Jim Eberle (General Physics) are speaking on "Managing a Global Learning Initiative: Working with Multiple Partners Across Cultures"
Date/Time: Tuesday, Nov 16th, from 12:00-12:45
For more information and to register, click here
Web special! Enter BC06 on your registration (under “customer registration code” on page 2) and receive a 20% discount!
Exercising Influence
November 3-4, San Francisco, CA
December 7-8, Milpitas, CA
Intelligent Risk-Taking
November 17-18, Milpitas, CA
Constructive Negotiation
December 1, 2004, Berkeley, CA
To
register for one of our public programs, click here
or go to: www.barnesconti.com/ppsched.php
Coming soon: our 2005 public program schedule! Watch our website for details.
This month, we offer this simple version of a Turkish classic. Lahmacun is traditionally made with a yeast dough; the pitas in this recipe make it a lot simpler.
Serves four as an entreé or eight as an appetizer. For a nearly authentic Turkish meal, serve with a salad of diced cucumbers and tomatoes, lightly dressed with olive oil and wine vinegar of lemon, and either stuffed grape leaves, hummus (garlicky pureé of chick-peas and sesame paste), or “cacik,” the Turkish name for tzatziki, a garlicky dip of yogurt, cucumber, and mint.
Wine suggestion: and earthy red such as a Spanish Rioja or Tempernillo, or a domestic Syrah or Zinfandel.
Go Book Go
Go book, go book and fill the minds of lonely children.
Go and fill the world with adventure.
Carry with you words of wisdom from all over the world.
Do not be afraid to create life in darkened minds.
On no account be afraid of exploring the universe and fill it
with
inspiration.
Refuse to give up on children’s imaginative minds.
Move around the Earth like a free soul and where shall you be
stopped!
Nowhere!
Protest against people giving up.
Create life in lonely souls all over the imaginative universe.
Yes go and fill empty minds with words of wisdom.
And above all never give up on your young apprentices.
Fill them with hope.
Tom Moller (Age 12)
Cottenham Village College
Cambridgeshire,
U.K.
Please send feedback to newsltr1
at barnesconti.com
Barnes & Conti, 940 Dwight Way Suite 15, Berkeley, CA 94710, USA
Copyright © 2006 Barnes & Conti Associates, Inc. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.